How to Measure
Empowerment is best measured using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Degrees of empowerment can be measured by looking at the existence of choice, the use of choice, and the achievement of choice. Empowerment is a journey not a destination. When measuring choice, it is important to consider who is being empowered. You can do this by:
Engaging those impacted in the development, implementation and evaluation, and compensating them for their time.
Using trusted communicators to collect input or feedback.
Embedding funds for training/capacity building of populations to support human-centered design.
Publicly reporting on progress in implementing feedback.
Creating formal structures to include worker voice at every step of the process.
Common Mechanisms for Collecting Qualitative Empowerment Data
- Focus groups: Small group conversations around a specific topic that are intended to create understanding, surface insights and foster connection. Generally focused on dialogue rather than specific data points. Can be used as a tool to directly inform the design of a program as well as a mechanism to collect qualitative evaluation data throughout the life of the program. Focus group insights might be the basis for persona development and user journey mapping.
- Surveys: Intended to capture views, attitudes and perceptions from a large group of individuals. Often collect basic biographic data to identify variances by group. Can be used as learning tools to inform program design or even help participants understand the environment and culture of an organization they are considering working for. Can also be used to educate participants about ways that they can continuously exercise voice and choice within an organization even after placement.
- Interviews: Generally a structured discussion conducted with an individual to collect specific insights on a program, approach or set of supports. Can be used to inform design, gauge effectiveness of a program or customize additional resources. Additionally, it is important to educate workers about the power of interview participation as an ongoing opportunity to exercise their voice and power.
Stage
|
Sample Metrics
|
---|---|
Program Design |
• Use human-centered design practices to guide design and development, including personas and mapping techniques |
Program Delivery |
• Conduct worker voice surveys to understand progress |
Evaluation |
• Request participant insights on the approach before initiating evaluation - consider the burden of the work |
Given the complexity, it is difficult to distill empowerment to a single metric and often requires an index or set of indicators. The extent or degree to which a person is empowered is influenced by personal agency (the capacity to make purposive choice) and opportunity structure (the institutional context in which choice is made). Methods to measure empowerment should be fit-for-purpose, meaning they are relevant and specific to content and target groups, taking into consideration the interpretations of empowerment (e.g., adolescents likely define empowerment differently than adults, even within the same community).
Categories for Measurement
|
Sample Metrics
|
---|---|
Existence of Choice |
• $ or % of investment in provision of family-centered, racially responsive coaching and support |
Use of Choice |
• Attendance at training/capacity building activities and next steps taken as a result |
Achievement of Choice |
• Increase in $ allocated to empowerment activities or paid to target group for their expertise/insights |
Tips for Measuring
Equity should be centered in your approach, this includes considering what and how data is collected, protected and disaggregated.
Message carriers matter – partner with representative individuals in meaningful ways to collect data.
Invest in skill building so that participants/workers can actively participate in the co-design and implementation of each stage of the work.